Page 1 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 1 of 16 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
^•U. UBRA'R' ARCHIVES uture FLORIDA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY Vol. 9 Friday, November 12. 1976 No. 12 Funds withdrawn for shooting range By LISA FERGUSON Staff Writer A proposal made to the administration by the FTU Sportsman's Club for land to build a university trap and skeet field will not be approved because the community organization willing to fund the project has withdrawn its offer. The proposal asked for about 55 acres of university land on which to build a trap and skeet field. "I thought it was a good proposal. They (Sportsman's Club) did a lot of work on it," said Jimmic Ferrell, director of Student Organizations. The Shooting Chapter of the FTU Sportsman's Club was offered the money to develop a combination skeet and trap shooting range and access road by the Orange County Trap and Skeet Club. The project would cost about $45,000 according to Ferrell. The university was asked to provide the land. The proposal was sent to John P. Goree, vice president of Business Affairs, on April 27. It was then circulated among various staff members who attached to it their questions and comments. The proposal was returned to Ferrell in August for the Sportsman's Club to answer the questions and revise the proposal. By then, the Orange County Trap and Skeet Club had lost interest and made a deal with another organization. Four of the six officials to whom the proposal was shown stated that noise from the facility would pose a problem. Oswald, O. Gracia, campus planner, said he was concerned about the noise from the range and its effect on the overall ecological balance of the campus. Dr. Martin P. Wanielista, chairman of the F.conological Committee said, "The committee was opposed to the proposal on the grounds of it not being consistent with the master plan and the noise associated with such a facility." FTU's legal . counsel, John D. Mahaffey, said that the noise from the range might eventually become a nuisance to surrounding communities. He added, "I, at one time, lived approximately 3/4 of a mile from a trap and skeet shooting range and am sorry to say that the noise practically drove me insane when there was a meet in progress." Mahaffey was also concerned about the possibility of having a suit filed (Continued on page 2) Photo by Bernal Schooley SMOKEY THE BEAR Visited the Child Care Center earlier this week much to the delight of the 60 two to five-year-olds who attend the Center. Pay hike delay cleared Registration where does it go? By BARRY BRADLEY Staff Writer Most students are aware that $2.14 of their registration, fee goes to Activity and Service Fees (A&SF) for student activities but many do not know where and how the other money is spent. For instance, $9.31 of each hour in the lower level and $10.81 of each hour in the upper level goes to a matriculation fee. Joseph Gomez, FTU comptroller, said this money goes to the educational and general budget which is used to operate the university. Last year FTU received over $17 million in educational funding from the state. Of this amount, over $4 million, or about 23 per cent, was contributed by students in the form of the matriculation fee. The money is used for faculty salaries and actual expenses incurred in the operation of the university. Jim Vickrey, assistant to the BOR Chancellor, said state dollars accounted for about 49 per cent of the total operating funds of the State University System (SUS). The other 51 per cent comes from student fees and from federal, state and local grants. Another $2.50 of each per hour fee goes in a category labeled building fee and capital improvement fee. These fees are actually the same thing but the building fee was established before the capital improvement fee and a different formula is used to compute each. This fund is divided* up among each of the state's nine universities on a need basis. The funds are used for new buildings or for improvement of present buildings. FTU received $3.7 million of these funds last year for the new educational building, for improvements in the library and for the new biology building. The fund is also used to retire the state bonds which were sold in order to finance new buildings. Still another category receives $.70 of each hour fee and is earmarked for student financial aid fee and the general student aid fee. Again, these are actually the same thing and they are used for the same purpose but they are computed using different formulas and are maintained separately. A related item is the student financial aid trust fee. This accounts for 35 cents of each hour fee and goes to the State Department of (Continued on page 2) By MARK HESS Managing Editor In response to a United Faculty of Florida (UFF) newsletter headlined "No Raises for FTU Faculty," a memo from the Academic Affairs office was released Wednesday clarifying for FTU's faculty what appeared to be a university hold-out on pay hikes which were awarded last month. • The Faculty Forum, FTU's newsletter for UFF members, stated in their Nov. 5 issue, "The UFF chapters at the other campuses in the State University System (SUS) report that they have received the raises won in the new collective-bargaining contract, but at Florida Tech it's a different story." The Forum continued, "Faculty and professional personnel here have no idea when the contractual commitment will be implemented, and members are still subsisting on the pre-inflation salaries of two years ago." The story called on the administration to "get on the ball." We would like answers to these questions. And the grapevine says that the Board of Regents (BOR) would like some answers to." (The last sentence of the story makes reference to Chancellor E. T. York's visit to FTU last week and his meeting with the Faculty Senate. It was reported that one of the faculty members present at the meeting questioned York about FTU being the last SUS school to receive their collective-bargaining pay hikes. York reportedly was bewildered by the question and answered he did not know why FTU had not received their raises because the other eight SUS schools had.) As it turns out, and was clarified by the memo from Vice President for Academic Affairs Dr. C. B. Gambrell, only two other universities had their collective-bargaining increases in the payroll checks before FTU . FTU's increase will be in the Nov. 19 paycheck. "Because the salary adjustment comments circulated by the UFF last week are grossly in error, I am providing you with the following accurate information based on contracts, with the various universities," the memo said. Listed in the memo were the expected paycheck increases for the other eight universities. "Several staff members in Payroll, Academic Affairs and the .Deans offices worked extra hours to complete these adjustments. As a result only two universities (University of West Florida and the University of North Florida both of which calculated early increases without waiting for specific BOR guidelines) will have the increase s in payroll checks prior to FTU." Carol Walters, coordinator of budget planning and analysis for the BOR said the differences between individual universities' paycheck hikes comes from "internal administrative differences," and all the payroll increases came out of Tallahassee at the same time. Dr. Frank Juge, executive assistant for employe relations, explained that the pay increases are "very complex calculations which require a lot of clarification. Part of the reason for any delay at all was getting the constant verification from the Board (of Regents)." Calculations for all basic, merit and retroactive salary adjustments must be made on an individual basis, Juge said. This explains why the smaller universities, like West Florida and North Florida, were able to include the pay. hikes before any of the other schools. Soccer squad denied playoff bid Photo by Bernal Schooley FTU'S SOCCER TEAM LOST on two goals this week. On Sunday they were passed over for the regional playoffs and Tuesday East Stroudsburg goalie, Chris Rand shut off a shot on goal (above). (See stories on page 14). *^ AM Ai-^HMlfe *«**»
Object Description
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Title-Alternative | FuTUre |
Preferred Title | Central Florida Future |
Tag | DP0013897 |
Subject | Orange County (Fla.) -- Newspapers |
Publisher | Florida Technological University |
Collection Description | Semi-weekly student newspaper of the University of Central Florida (UCF). It started in 1968 upon the opening of Florida Technological University (FTU), UCF's predecessor. Initially it was called "FuTUre" and published weekly. The words "Central Florida" were added around the time the school changed to UCF. It is available in microfilm (1968-1986, library call number LD1772.F9 A1438), online (September 2001-current, at http://www.centralfloridafuture.com) and in University Archives (1968-current). |
Format | image/jp2 |
Size Original | 29cm x 42.5cm |
Repository | University of Central Florida Libraries, Special Collections & University Archives |
Repository Collection | University Publications |
Type | Newspapers |
Language | English |
Relation | Online: September 2000-current available at: http://www.centralfloridafuture.com/ |
Source | Paper and microform editions (http://ucf.catalog.fcla.edu/permalink.jsp?29CF025995369) |
Place | Orlando (Fla.) |
Coverage-Temporal | 20th century |
Rights | All rights to images are held by the respective holding institution. This image is posted publicly for non-profit educational uses, excluding printed publication. For permission to reproduce images and/or for copyright information contact Special Collections & University Archives, University of Central Florida Libraries, Orlando, FL 32816, (407) 823-2576, email: speccoll@mail.ucf.edu ; All rights to images are held by the respective holding institution. This image is posted publicly for non-profit educational uses, excluding printed publication. For permission to reproduce images and/or for copyright information contact Special Collections and University Archives, University of Central Florida Libraries, (407) 823-2576 http://library.ucf.edu/SpecialCollections/ |
Digital Publisher | Electronically reproduced by the Digital Services unit of the University of Central Florida Libraries, Orlando, 2014. |
Digital Reproduction Specifications | Jpeg2000 images were derived from no less than 400 dpi tiff images. |
Transcript | ^•U. UBRA'R' ARCHIVES uture FLORIDA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY Vol. 9 Friday, November 12. 1976 No. 12 Funds withdrawn for shooting range By LISA FERGUSON Staff Writer A proposal made to the administration by the FTU Sportsman's Club for land to build a university trap and skeet field will not be approved because the community organization willing to fund the project has withdrawn its offer. The proposal asked for about 55 acres of university land on which to build a trap and skeet field. "I thought it was a good proposal. They (Sportsman's Club) did a lot of work on it," said Jimmic Ferrell, director of Student Organizations. The Shooting Chapter of the FTU Sportsman's Club was offered the money to develop a combination skeet and trap shooting range and access road by the Orange County Trap and Skeet Club. The project would cost about $45,000 according to Ferrell. The university was asked to provide the land. The proposal was sent to John P. Goree, vice president of Business Affairs, on April 27. It was then circulated among various staff members who attached to it their questions and comments. The proposal was returned to Ferrell in August for the Sportsman's Club to answer the questions and revise the proposal. By then, the Orange County Trap and Skeet Club had lost interest and made a deal with another organization. Four of the six officials to whom the proposal was shown stated that noise from the facility would pose a problem. Oswald, O. Gracia, campus planner, said he was concerned about the noise from the range and its effect on the overall ecological balance of the campus. Dr. Martin P. Wanielista, chairman of the F.conological Committee said, "The committee was opposed to the proposal on the grounds of it not being consistent with the master plan and the noise associated with such a facility." FTU's legal . counsel, John D. Mahaffey, said that the noise from the range might eventually become a nuisance to surrounding communities. He added, "I, at one time, lived approximately 3/4 of a mile from a trap and skeet shooting range and am sorry to say that the noise practically drove me insane when there was a meet in progress." Mahaffey was also concerned about the possibility of having a suit filed (Continued on page 2) Photo by Bernal Schooley SMOKEY THE BEAR Visited the Child Care Center earlier this week much to the delight of the 60 two to five-year-olds who attend the Center. Pay hike delay cleared Registration where does it go? By BARRY BRADLEY Staff Writer Most students are aware that $2.14 of their registration, fee goes to Activity and Service Fees (A&SF) for student activities but many do not know where and how the other money is spent. For instance, $9.31 of each hour in the lower level and $10.81 of each hour in the upper level goes to a matriculation fee. Joseph Gomez, FTU comptroller, said this money goes to the educational and general budget which is used to operate the university. Last year FTU received over $17 million in educational funding from the state. Of this amount, over $4 million, or about 23 per cent, was contributed by students in the form of the matriculation fee. The money is used for faculty salaries and actual expenses incurred in the operation of the university. Jim Vickrey, assistant to the BOR Chancellor, said state dollars accounted for about 49 per cent of the total operating funds of the State University System (SUS). The other 51 per cent comes from student fees and from federal, state and local grants. Another $2.50 of each per hour fee goes in a category labeled building fee and capital improvement fee. These fees are actually the same thing but the building fee was established before the capital improvement fee and a different formula is used to compute each. This fund is divided* up among each of the state's nine universities on a need basis. The funds are used for new buildings or for improvement of present buildings. FTU received $3.7 million of these funds last year for the new educational building, for improvements in the library and for the new biology building. The fund is also used to retire the state bonds which were sold in order to finance new buildings. Still another category receives $.70 of each hour fee and is earmarked for student financial aid fee and the general student aid fee. Again, these are actually the same thing and they are used for the same purpose but they are computed using different formulas and are maintained separately. A related item is the student financial aid trust fee. This accounts for 35 cents of each hour fee and goes to the State Department of (Continued on page 2) By MARK HESS Managing Editor In response to a United Faculty of Florida (UFF) newsletter headlined "No Raises for FTU Faculty," a memo from the Academic Affairs office was released Wednesday clarifying for FTU's faculty what appeared to be a university hold-out on pay hikes which were awarded last month. • The Faculty Forum, FTU's newsletter for UFF members, stated in their Nov. 5 issue, "The UFF chapters at the other campuses in the State University System (SUS) report that they have received the raises won in the new collective-bargaining contract, but at Florida Tech it's a different story." The Forum continued, "Faculty and professional personnel here have no idea when the contractual commitment will be implemented, and members are still subsisting on the pre-inflation salaries of two years ago." The story called on the administration to "get on the ball." We would like answers to these questions. And the grapevine says that the Board of Regents (BOR) would like some answers to." (The last sentence of the story makes reference to Chancellor E. T. York's visit to FTU last week and his meeting with the Faculty Senate. It was reported that one of the faculty members present at the meeting questioned York about FTU being the last SUS school to receive their collective-bargaining pay hikes. York reportedly was bewildered by the question and answered he did not know why FTU had not received their raises because the other eight SUS schools had.) As it turns out, and was clarified by the memo from Vice President for Academic Affairs Dr. C. B. Gambrell, only two other universities had their collective-bargaining increases in the payroll checks before FTU . FTU's increase will be in the Nov. 19 paycheck. "Because the salary adjustment comments circulated by the UFF last week are grossly in error, I am providing you with the following accurate information based on contracts, with the various universities," the memo said. Listed in the memo were the expected paycheck increases for the other eight universities. "Several staff members in Payroll, Academic Affairs and the .Deans offices worked extra hours to complete these adjustments. As a result only two universities (University of West Florida and the University of North Florida both of which calculated early increases without waiting for specific BOR guidelines) will have the increase s in payroll checks prior to FTU." Carol Walters, coordinator of budget planning and analysis for the BOR said the differences between individual universities' paycheck hikes comes from "internal administrative differences," and all the payroll increases came out of Tallahassee at the same time. Dr. Frank Juge, executive assistant for employe relations, explained that the pay increases are "very complex calculations which require a lot of clarification. Part of the reason for any delay at all was getting the constant verification from the Board (of Regents)." Calculations for all basic, merit and retroactive salary adjustments must be made on an individual basis, Juge said. This explains why the smaller universities, like West Florida and North Florida, were able to include the pay. hikes before any of the other schools. Soccer squad denied playoff bid Photo by Bernal Schooley FTU'S SOCCER TEAM LOST on two goals this week. On Sunday they were passed over for the regional playoffs and Tuesday East Stroudsburg goalie, Chris Rand shut off a shot on goal (above). (See stories on page 14). *^ AM Ai-^HMlfe *«**» |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1